Comparing+ more
Home › Guides › Pension Transfers › Section 75 Employer Debt

Section 75 Employer Debt: What It Means for Your DB Pension

Section 75 of the Pensions Act 1995 can force employers to pay enormous debts when they stop participating in a defined benefit pension scheme. This guide explains how the debt is calculated, when it is triggered, and what it means for your pension security.

12 min read Updated March 2026

What Is a Section 75 Employer Debt?

Section 75 of the Pensions Act 1995 (as amended by the Pensions Act 2004) imposes a statutory debt on employers who participate in defined benefit (DB) pension schemes. When certain triggering events occur — such as the last active member leaving the scheme or an employer withdrawing from a multi-employer arrangement — the employer must pay a debt to the pension scheme trustees.

The debt represents the employer's share of the shortfall between the scheme's assets and the cost of securing all accrued benefits by purchasing annuities from an insurance company. This is known as the buy-out basis, and it almost always produces a much larger figure than the scheme's ongoing funding deficit reported in actuarial valuations.

Important: A Section 75 debt can be many times larger than the deficit figure you see in scheme accounts. Buy-out costs reflect the price insurance companies charge to guarantee pension payments, including their own profit margins and regulatory capital requirements. For some schemes, the buy-out deficit can be double or triple the technical provisions deficit.

When Does a Section 75 Debt Get Triggered?

A Section 75 debt is triggered by an employment-cessation event. The most common triggers include:

  • Last active member leaves — when the final employee contributing to the scheme stops accruing benefits, whether through redundancy, resignation, or the scheme closing to future accrual
  • Employer withdrawal from a multi-employer scheme — when one participating employer exits while others remain
  • Scheme wind-up — when the scheme is formally wound up and all benefits must be secured
  • Employer insolvency — although in this case the debt may be uncollectable and the Pension Protection Fund may step in

How Is the Debt Calculated?

The calculation follows a specific methodology set out in legislation:

  1. Determine the buy-out cost — the actuary estimates the total cost of purchasing annuity contracts from an insurance company to secure all members' accrued benefits
  2. Subtract the scheme's assets — the market value of the scheme's investments at the trigger date
  3. Allocate to the employer — in a single-employer scheme, the entire deficit is the employer's debt. In multi-employer schemes, the debt is apportioned based on the employer's share of the scheme liabilities
Example: A scheme has buy-out liabilities of £50 million and assets of £35 million. The buy-out deficit is £15 million. If the departing employer is responsible for 40% of the scheme's liabilities, their Section 75 debt would be approximately £6 million.

Section 75 in Multi-Employer Schemes

Multi-employer DB schemes present particular complications. When one employer leaves, the remaining employers do not inherit the departing employer's liabilities — instead, the departing employer must pay its full share of the buy-out deficit. This can create serious problems:

  • Orphan liabilities — if the departing employer cannot pay, the deficit falls on the scheme, potentially affecting all members
  • Domino effect — a large Section 75 debt can push a weaker employer into insolvency, triggering further departures
  • Last man standing — in some scheme structures, the final remaining employer may face the full buy-out deficit for all members, not just its own employees

Alternatives and Mitigation Strategies

Employers facing a potential Section 75 debt have several options to manage the liability:

Period of Grace

If the trigger event is the last active member leaving, the employer has a 12-month grace period. If a new active member joins (or an existing deferred member resumes active membership) within that period, the debt is not crystallised. The employer must notify the trustees of their intention to use this provision.

Withdrawal Arrangements

In multi-employer schemes, employers may be able to negotiate a withdrawal arrangement or approved withdrawal arrangement with the trustees. These allow the debt to be paid over time or modified to reflect the employer's ability to pay, subject to trustee and sometimes Pensions Regulator approval.

Regulated Apportionment Arrangements (RAAs)

A RAA allows an employer to transfer its Section 75 debt to another entity, typically as part of a corporate restructuring. These require approval from the Pensions Regulator and must demonstrate that the arrangement is in the best interests of scheme members.

Flexible Apportionment Arrangements (FAAs)

FAAs allow employers in multi-employer schemes to share or transfer their liabilities between participating employers by agreement, avoiding a formal Section 75 trigger. Both the departing and receiving employers must agree, and the arrangement must be notified to the trustees.

Employer beware: Attempting to avoid a Section 75 debt through artificial corporate restructuring can attract scrutiny from the Pensions Regulator. Contribution notices and financial support directions can be issued to connected parties, making avoidance strategies risky and potentially costly.

Impact on Pension Scheme Members

As a scheme member, a Section 75 debt does not directly change your accrued benefits. Your pension rights are protected by law. However, the practical implications can be significant:

  • If the employer pays the debt — the scheme's funding improves, which is positive for member security
  • If the employer cannot pay — the scheme may remain underfunded, potentially entering the PPF where compensation levels may be lower than your full entitlement
  • Corporate restructuring — employers sometimes restructure to manage Section 75 exposure, which can affect job security and future pension accrual

Section 75 and Pension Transfers

Understanding Section 75 is relevant if you are considering a DB pension transfer. If your employer faces a large potential Section 75 debt and may struggle to pay it, the security of your pension could be at risk. In this context, transferring to a personal pension might protect your full benefit value rather than receiving reduced PPF compensation.

However, a transfer means giving up guaranteed benefits, and the decision should only be made with regulated financial advice. The transfer value offered by the scheme may already reflect the employer's financial position.

Recent Developments

The funding landscape for DB schemes has improved significantly since 2022. Rising interest rates have reduced buy-out deficits across most UK schemes, meaning Section 75 debts are generally smaller than they were during the low-interest-rate era. Many schemes are now in surplus on a buy-out basis, which means departing employers may face no Section 75 debt at all — or may even be entitled to a share of surplus, depending on scheme rules.

Positive trend: According to the Pension Protection Fund, aggregate DB scheme funding has improved dramatically, with the majority of schemes now estimated to be in surplus on a buy-out basis. This means Section 75 debts are shrinking across the UK pension landscape. The PPF levy has dropped to zero as a result of improved funding.

Next Steps

If you are a member of a DB pension scheme and concerned about your employer's financial health or a potential Section 75 event, consider the following actions:

  • Review your scheme's latest annual funding statement to understand the current deficit position
  • Check whether your employer has been making additional deficit repair contributions
  • Understand the scheme funding level on both an ongoing and buy-out basis
  • Seek advice from an FCA-regulated pension adviser if you are considering a transfer

Frequently Asked Questions

A Section 75 employer debt is a legal obligation under the Pensions Act 1995. When an employer ceases to participate in a DB scheme or the last employee leaves, the employer must pay a debt to the scheme equal to its share of the buy-out deficit. This is calculated using insurance company annuity rates, which typically produces a larger figure than the ongoing funding deficit.
A Section 75 debt is triggered when an employment-cessation event occurs. This includes the last active member leaving the scheme, the employer ceasing to employ active members, or the employer withdrawing from a multi-employer scheme. It can also be triggered by a scheme wind-up.
The debt is calculated as the employer's share of the difference between the scheme's assets and the cost of securing all accrued benefits through insurance company annuities (the buy-out basis). Because annuity rates from insurers are conservative, the buy-out deficit is almost always larger than the ongoing technical provisions deficit.
There are limited options. Employers can use regulated apportionment arrangements, withdrawal arrangements, or flexible apportionment arrangements. A period of grace provision allows employers to avoid triggering the debt if they re-employ an active member within 12 months.
A Section 75 debt does not directly reduce your accrued pension. Your benefits remain protected by law. However, if the employer cannot pay the debt, the scheme may be underfunded and could enter the PPF, where compensation levels may be lower than your full entitlement.

Ready to get expert pension advice?

Answer a few quick questions and get matched with an FCA-regulated pension adviser. Free, no obligation.

Get Pension Advice →

Trusted by thousands • FCA-regulated advisers • Free matching service